• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Alan Chapman

Alan Chapman

  • WELCOME
  • LOVE
  • MUSIC
  • COACH

Alan Chapman

Theory Of Infinite Universes All Inside Our Heads by Alan Chapman

23 August 2023 by Alan Chapman

 

My ‘Theory Of Infinite Universes, All Inside Our Heads’

This is an interim posting pending my producing and publishing a more complete and dedicated section on this website for this subject.  

Below is the original blog article I published on Sunday 23rd August 2020, 2:21pm, on the Businessballs.com website, and below that please see my additional notes about my founding of the Businessballs.com website.
 
My email to Jim Peebles explaining my ‘Theory Of Infinite Universes, All Inside Our Heads’ is dated 7th June 2020, and logically I conceived the theory, and I mentioned it to/discussed it with other people, several days or weeks prior to emailing Jim Peebles.
 
I was prompted to email Jim because I’d read about his work for which he won the Nobel Prize, specifically in asserting that time has no beginning nor end.
 
Here’s my original blog article: 
———————————————————————————————————————–
 
Beautiful Pointlessness Hopelessness
by Alan Chapman – Sunday, 23 August 2020, 2:21 PM
[for] Anyone in the world
 

The Beautiful Pointlessness and Hopelessness of Life

I preface this article with:

  • A Theory of Infinite Universes. 
  • My firm assurance that I love life and everything in it, including all the dark as well as the light. It is all life.
  • A reminder that words and meaning are not the same – especially here my words ‘pointlessness’ and ‘hopelessness’ mean different things to most people’s interpretations; notably ‘pointlessness’ and ‘hopelessness’ are positive beautiful words to me, not negative; they equate to uncertainty, which to me is beautiful positive reality, i.e., the actual truthful state of life and universe: uncertainty.
  • I personally have a point and hope, merely as far as my own thoughts and feelings extend – which equate to my own purpose and meaning – but I do not extend or apply point and hope to life beyond me, because all of life outside of my head is uncertain, and to imagine otherwise is illusory. 

The Theory of Infinite Universes is an important preface or introduction to this article because it emphasizes that this article is how I see and feel and think about life, universe, and everything.

Everyone has the right to see life, universe and everything, as they want.

Probably no other people see life, universe and everything, as I do. And this is so for each of us. We each see everything in our own unique ways.

We each have our own unique value; no more or less than anyone else.

Theory of Infinite Universes

Anyone can theorize about life, universe and everything – and anything within/related. Anything. Try it. Share it. Think and talk. Be all you want to be. We especially have a right and maybe responsibility to theorize  – or share what we have learned – about anything that is part of profound personal experience for us. 

This ‘Theory of Infinite Universes’ is very much part of my profound experience in my life, based on what I have seen, touched and experienced. 

Incidentally, in 2020 I shared my Theory of Infinite Universes with Jim Peebles, the 2019 Nobel Prizewinner in Physics. Jim replied kindly to my ideas, not disagreeing nor proposing an alternative, agreeing that life is wonderful and encouraging me to ‘keep thinking’. Obviously, I am hugely grateful for Jim’s kindness and encouragement.  

Here’s the actual email exchange. Apart from anything else, it shows that a very simple person like me can engage with a true genius like Jim Peebles. 

I encourage everyone to reach for the stars. Especially the stars closest to your heart and your dreams, because you will reach these stars more wonderfully than you can imagine.


 

Subject: Re: suicide/cosmos
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:06:50 +0000
From: P. James E. Peebles <pjep@Princeton.EDU>
To: alan chapman <ac@alanchapman.com>

Hello Alan. Yes, admire every moment, and keep thinking. The world is a wonderful place. Jim

On Jun 7, 2020, at 9:49 AM, alan chapman <ac@alanchapman.com> wrote:

Jim hi – i work deep in suicide. Fearlessly welcoming death when it comes, loving every moment/thing until then.

Do you agree perhaps there are infinite universes and we switch between them, as a single/whole/infinitely permutated consciousness?

We’ll never know/explain, in human constructs, except simply to ‘be’, do you imagine?

Thanks, love, best wishes,

Alan Chapman

Anstey, Leics. UK

Businesballs, FoLaD, RudeAngel, etc.

————————————————————————————–

Additionally, I would word it as follows. 

The Theory of Infinite Universes is a work in progress, and simply that:

 

  1. There are infinite universes.
  2. We each ‘switch’ between universes, constantly.
  3. The universes all exist inside our heads, individually and collectively; and infinitely.* 
  4. We each make our own universe.**

* ‘Infinitely’, especially because there are 7.5 billion people alive using their brains today, and people are being born and dying constantly, and changing their thinking and feelings constantly too. 

** We each make our own universe every moment that we are alive, and perhaps before we are born and after we die too.

I’ll write more here in this blog section about the Theory of Infinite Universes perhaps, because I have thought and written lots about it, and lots more is emerging. I am open to discussion with anyone about it.

Jim Peebles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Peebles) was born April 25 1935. 

Wikipedia (Aug 2020) says of Peebles – and note especially his comments about the ‘Big Bang’ and notion of a ‘beginning’ (with which I certainly agree):

Canadian-American astrophysicist, astronomer, and theoretical cosmologist, the Albert Einstein Professor of Science, Emeritus, at Princeton University (at 2020), widely regarded as one of the world’s leading theoretical cosmologists in the period since 1970, with major theoretical contributions to primordial nucleosynthesis, dark matter, the cosmic microwave background, and structure formation. Peebles was awarded half of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2019 for his theoretical discoveries in physical cosmology. He shared the prize with Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz for their discovery of an exoplanet orbiting a sun-like star. In his award presentation, Peebles noted that he does not prefer the term ‘Big Bang Theory’, since “…it connotes the notion of an event and a position, both of which are quite wrong.” While much of his work relates to the development of the universe from its first few seconds, he is more sceptical about what we can know about the very beginning, and stated, “It’s very unfortunate that one thinks of the beginning whereas in fact, we have no good theory of such a thing as the beginning.”

 

The Beautiful Pointlessness and Hopelessness of Life

Very briefly and concisely, what I mean by: ‘The Beautiful Pointlessness and Hopelessness of Life’ is – that in all of time/universe(s), whether we take the view, that time/universe(s):

 

  • exist only in the ‘now’ or present,
  • are 13.5bn years old and still counting,
  • or anything else,

we humans, individually, collectively, as a species or humanity, are completely insignificant. Except in the ‘now’ of our own heads. Because all that really exists is the ‘now’, which of course also contains all of our individual and collective, mistaken, biased, distorted, ideas of the past and the future – and of ourselves. 

All of history is distorted by interpretations and bias and propaganda, and anyway is past and cannot be changed. 

All of the future is uncertain, unpredictable and uncontrollable, although we struggle to accept this until we are ‘reborn’ and enlightened, which is a central aspect of this article. And so, hope – as we normally define it – being based on a wish for some form of imagined future, is illusory.

The hope for me is that I continue to love my dying, because this gives me my wonderment, my gratitude and acceptance, my peace, my fearlessness, my forgiveness of others, especially of the ungrown and damaged and dangerous, and my loving of everything  – the light and dark.

And there is no point to life, except the acceptance of the ‘now’, and the beauty of the ‘now’.

This is, I remind you, in the universe(s), that I make for myself. And that if we attach hopes to beliefs that we can predict or control the future, and/or by interpreting the past in our own ways, then these hopes and beliefs can only ever be illusory.

And while living a life based on illusions, are valid universes for those who choose these universes, personally I choose universes in which I am dead already, and therefore I am free to live and love and enjoy the beauty, of the pointlessness and hopelessness, of a life in which I embrace my dying, fearlessly and lovingly.

I understand that I am unusual in this approach to life and death.

This makes my living quite lonely in many ways, because so few people think and feel as I do, although I’m fortunate to enjoy isolation, and being in nature, and my own creative works, especially in music and re-purposing plastic bottles and other ‘rubbish’, and making tea from nettles, etc. And I realise that how I think and feel, is quite disturbing for very many people, even though it’s miraculously beautiful to me.    

And so I (try to) talk less and listen more. This is a constant work. I strive to love myself. As I believe we all should.

And especially I love my wonderment at this life and world, in which usually I feel I no longer belong. Not least because I feel like I’m already dead. And the more I feel I do not belong, then the more my wonderment at it all increases, and the more beautiful life is.

So while I live, in this human form, while also being dead, I enjoy every beautiful moment, grain and raindrop.

Everything.

Every,

pointlessly,

hopelessly,

beautiful,

thing. 

Love,

Alan

Some other notes: 

I believe that at some time in each of our lives we become like a living dead person.

This is such a profound acceptance of our own dying, that we become ‘reborn’, as if living already dead, and therefore peaceful, free, fearless and loving.

Nothing matters really except the beauty of now.

That is, we are still alive in a normal physical sense, but in our approach to and relationship with life, we think and feel as if we are dead.  

For most people this happens very late in life, commonly when very near to death.

For some people it seems to happen sooner in life.

For me I arrived at this peace via suicidal bereavement, other life-threatening traumas, suicidal ideation, attempt, survival, study, creative work, and helping others through similar experiences.

There are many other paths to peace.   

This is also dependent on the person being able to sense and feel and think for themselves, free of pharmaceutical interventions that cause a numbness or unthinking/unfeeling condition, which sadly is the situation for increasingly many people nowadays.

Anyway, for those fortunate to experience the progress and growth of one’s life towards death – which of course begins when we are born – at some time in our life, before we die in a conventional physical sense – we are properly ‘born’  – commonly called ‘re-born’ – as awakened enlightened people.

This state of rebirth or awakening or enlightenment is the state of being living dead. My words for this, at times, are ‘living dead’.

Other people (including me sometimes) call this ‘peace’, as well as enlightenment, and other equating language.

Buddhism refers in various ways to similar concepts.

More recent religions than Buddhism describe death as a much more separate condition, equating to a version of heaven or hell.

Buddhism refers to a soul continuing, commonly interpreted as a form or reincarnation.

My Theory of Infinite Universes means to me that all interpretations are valid and meaningful, especially for the person holding his/her own interpretation.

My own view of ‘living dead’ is similar to, and extending, Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration – notably its fundamental proposition that we are immature and not properly born as independent fearless peaceful people until and unless we have disintegrated suicidally, i.e., wanting/wanted to die, and grown traumatically through this experience, which is essentially the acceptance and embracing of our own mortality and dying.

The work of Stephen Jenkinson (Griefwalker, Die Wise, and Orphan Wisdom, etc) helps explain more about the embracing of one’s own dying – at any age. 

Viktor Frankl (Man’s Search for Meaning and Yes to Life) also explains helpfully and deeply about becoming ‘reborn’ through trauma, so as to live fearlessly and lovingly. Other Nazi Holocaust writers such as Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi explore and convey interpretations of the same growth, so that we might understand better the power of the human mind, via stories, because words and language otherwise are so inadequate.

Nietzsche and many other thinkers offer helpful perspectives to making sense, and universes, from all this.

You will find references and more information and explanations about all this and related matters on other articles in this blog section.

Much of the beauty of my universes seems to be from blending beautiful truths, and this makes sense from the perspective of the connected consciousness, of everything, being all that actually ‘is’.

Whatever is in one’s heart (if this conveys love and self-love best).

“All I really certainly want to do, besides enjoying the beauties of now, is to die,

to be unborn again,

and this is perhaps the biggest loneliness.

Not to stop the pain,

because there’s no pain now,

and anyway any more pain is growth.

I’ve lived and learned this.

Absolutely I have peace.

Simply because,

probably,

I’m done here now.

Is how this universe feels now,

although uncertainty is beautiful.

There is no more truth,

than the beautiful nothingness of being unborn.”

“The pointless,

hopeless,

beautiful,

nothingness,

of being unborn.”

 

Tags: 
Thought Leaders 
Lifestyle and Environment 
Health and Well-being 
Mental Health 
Personal Relationships 
Love 
theory of infinite universes
Permalink
Modified: Friday, 19 February 2021, 11:55 AM [*]
Comments (0)

[*] [I am uncertain why this modification/date/time is in the original blog article. I might have added the ‘other notes’ later, although I think far more likely is that the ‘modification’ is a ‘server-side’ non-content update as part of Accipio’s long-standing challenges in trying to make the Businessballs website work properly.]     


 

The background story to my founding of the Businessballs.com website, and what happened to it, and to me

 
I founded the Businessballs.com website, firstly on a free ‘Pipex Dial’ webspace that was free with my Pipex Dial internet connection, in mid-late 1990s. 
I bought the domain names Businessballs.com and AlanChapman.com in November 1999.
My intention was then to host the website on the AlanChapman.com domain, but my brilliant hosting provider (Ashley Large) suggested, in his opinion, that Businessballs.com was a better domain name. Ashley (whose Host365.com company continued to host Businessballs.com and my email services and other websites until 2017) was vastly more experienced than me in website and internet operations, and given my love and passion for the Businessballs name, I decided to follow Ashley’s advice.
I worked with Ashley because I received a fax in November 1999 from his company Host365.com offering domain and hosting services for businesses wanting their own website domains.
I originated the Businessballs name in 1995, as branding for my juggling balls and related ‘play-oriented’ learning and development services that I was using in human resources and training services to the business and organisational sectors.* 
 

What happened later…

Sometime in the early 2000s, I think around 2008-2010, I was approached by Sascha Benson-Cooper, the founder and owner of Accipio.com, a learning and development company providing leadership training and qualifications, and online hosting and website development services.
Sascha told me in a telephone call that he had been a huge fan and follower of Businessballs.com for several years, that the website had helped him develop his own career and business, and a little of his personal and work background: his age; that he had come to England from New Zealand; that he’d been a passenger airline pilot; and quite a lot about his business Accipio.com and his ‘charitable work’. He did not tell me at this time, nor has he ever volunteered the fact that his nationality is Austrian.
He explained that his company offered leadership training qualifications, which was something I did not do, and which I was keen to offer to my audience, which was then around 1.5 million unique visitors every month, and over 3 million page views every month.
At this time Businesssballs.com was ranked by Alexa at about 10,000 among all the many millions of websites in the world, and was the leading independent leadership learning and development resources website in the world.
By this time, also, the technical demands of running a website had evolved so that online editing had become the ‘norm’ and beyond my capabilities. Therefore my youngest brother (extremely brilliant at web design and many other things) was then responsible for much of the ‘server-side’ coding and design of Businessballs.com.
Significantly, when Sascha and Accipio.com took responsibility for hosting and redeveloping Businessballs.com in 2017, my brother Graham was not consulted at all, despite my strong recommendations and suggestions that he should be, and my introduction of Graham to Sascha, and Graham’s willingness to help Sascha. A similar situation occurred in the services of the designer Stephen Good, who’d worked with me and my websites including Businesballs.com, especially on branding and the Businessballs logos, since 1995.
When the redeveloped Businessssballs.com website was relaunched by Sascha and Accipio.com in Autumn 2017, after the web design work was contracted to developers in India, its traffic and popularity collapsed catastrophically, and so too my earnings.
 
 
*Prior to developing the Businessballs juggling brand and activities, I used the ‘play’ approach to leadership and team development in conceiving a team-building rugby-based concept, for which I had agreed permission with the world-renowned and world-class Leicester Tigers Rugby Union Club to use the Welford Road pitch and other Welford Road facilities. This was featured in a broadsheet newspaper article at the time, which one day I might find and republish or point to. Perhaps predictably, with fast-increasing professionalisation and commercialisation of the English and international Rugby Union game through the 1990s, my agreement with Leicester Tigers was cancelled. Some where in my old computer files I have a copy of the email correspondence. Nowadays of course, and for many years, not even the Leicester Tigers first team practices or plays on the Welford Road pitch aside from actually playing in a proper fixture.  
Anyway, back to Businessballs.com, I built the website and maintained it for several years using an offline website editing program called HotMetalPro.  This was basically a text editor, and in the times when the leading search engines were Yahoo and AltaVista; before Google, and before the BBC had significant web/internet presence.
The BBC (which I worked with via my consultancy services for the official BBC-sanctioned and supported ‘Archers Addicts’ fan club) had a very small office (two or three work-stations for its fledgling online services, with two or perhaps three staff at most, based at the then BBC centre at White City in London. I visited this office with the MD of the Archers Addicts business, Hedli Niklaus (Hedli Tanner) around the year 1997/98m, for a meeting to discuss website and online developments, and recall a discussion between the two BBC staff we met then, in which they discussed and agreed that they were using Yahoo.com as their preferred search engine.  This was prior to the BBC acquiring the bbc.com domain name in 1999 for $375,000 from Boston Business Computing; a fact that the BBC did not reveal until several years later, and I quote from Wikipedia retrieved 23rd August 2023, “…but the price of this purchase was not revealed until six years later.” 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Filed Under: Uncategorised

Life Coaching

26 October 2022 by Alan Chapman

After several decades of corporate leadership and successfully coaching multinational corporations, and then since 1999 coaching millions of teachers and leaders globally (via Businessballs.com) I am now coaching a new generation of leaders towards and achieving:

  • your own peaceful transcendent aims – whatever they are

and

  • your own unique use of language and creativity, amplified by more powerful energies

I understand and teach fearlessness, and the infinite powers that are enabled by becoming fearless.

Ask me for details.

Filed Under: Uncategorised

corporate soul

1 May 2022 by Alan Chapman

‘Corporate Soul’

exploring our inner space

 

‘Corporate Soul’ is a way I refer to an emergent sort of transformational leadership.

For many of us – when we are ready – this our exploration and growth of our inner self.

Exploring our inner space, which includes what we make of outer space 🙂

These principles of  are universally applicable, for example to transform:

  • the biggest global corporations and institutions
  • other enterprises and groups
  • educational and charitable bodies
  • small businesses and individuals

This is the nature of soul; it is universal; present in everything and everyone.

For some people soul requires explanation; for others none.

We might think of this to be (among other terms):

  • finding peace and calm
  • understanding ourselves
  • becoming free of conditioning
  • living in ‘the now’
  • living authentically or naturally
  • forgiveness, abundance, love, and compassion

Soul tends to be what we understand through experience, intuition, instinct, spirituality, rather than by ‘taught’ theory, especially someone else’s theory, although each of us is entitled to our own truth.

I believe that we can work with the soul of something when we open ourselves to ‘living’ and ‘being’ in ways that transcend conventional tangible measurements.

It is possible to define, quantify and measure ‘traditional’ tangible and ‘intangible’ aspects of organisations and personal leadership, such as:

  • financial
  • dimensions of scale or volume
  • time
  • ethos
  • opinion and reputation, etc

But qualities of the ‘soul’ are very different.

To varying degrees we live and work and exist in our own sense of a ‘now’ that is shaped almost entirely by what we imagine the present and past and future to be.

This sense of ‘now’ includes our view of our ‘self’ and others and everything else. It is our conditioned thinking.

And yet our magical joys in life are not defined or constrained by human constructs of language and time, and especially not by what we’ve been conditioned and taught to imagine our senses to be.

When we experience our most joyful moments in life we cannot explain these feelings, because these joys transcend human constructs of explanation.

We know it when we feel it: alone and especially with others.

We need not explain it.

It seems to me that the greatest things in life and death, and anything else, need not actually be explained.

In fact nothing needs to be explained, depending on one’s view of self and everything 🙂

Instead the greatest things – the things that transcend our capability to define them – are best simply accepted, embraced, and lived and shown, in gratitude and abundance, so that others can do likewise.

‘Corporate soul’ is how I approach organisations and human systems; large and small.

Where I use the word ‘organisation’ this can refer to:

  • all of humankind and all life and energies as we might imagine everything,
  • any group of people,
  • or a single person,
  • or a moment’s thought,
  • and everything in between.

Because everything is energy.

‘Corporate soul’ is how I imagine we can grow this awareness and openness to being free of our conditioned ‘now’, to living increasingly transcendently.

It’s about peace and harmony, and our connectedness with a reality that is more ‘real’.

It’s about how we build a world in which our children – all children – and everyone – can exist peacefully, fearlessly and lovingly.

Here is some context and some questions that might interest anyone considering his/her soul, and particularly considering the soul of a corporation or other organisation.

Some soul questions to open some doors…

  • In the context of 14 billion years since the ‘Big Bang’ (a supposed but unproven beginning of the universe), or there being no beginning nor end of the universe/time/space:
  • “What is our purpose?”
  • “What is our meaning?”
  • “What context do you think is most appropriate for considering the purpose and meaning of a person and a corporation or organisation?”
  • “How might a corporation or employer be more helpful for people?”
  • “What is leadership?”
  • “How can leadership best be measured?”

Again, the context is 14bn years, or no beginning or end of time/space.

 

Soul

  • Soul simply is.
  • Soul needs not to be understood nor explained.
  • Soul knows what our thinking brains cannot and need not.
  • Soul knows what it is doing 🙂
  • Let it.

Imagine

  • What do you imagine about the ‘soul’ of something?
  • And what do you imagine about your own ‘soul’?
  • What does your ‘soul’ mean to you?

Soul leaders

  • How can leaders help people become more comfortable and peaceful in uncertainty?
  • What is a transcendent corporation?
  • What is the soul of a human system?

Explanation and emergent design

  • We live in increasing awareness of our inexplicable existence.
  • Soul enables and empowers emergent design.
  • Soul here refers to our being part of energies that are beyond theoretical science.
  • Soul is a vast opportunity to re-imagine leadership 🙂

It’s different for each of us, and yet we are each connected

  • We each have many different relationships with organisations.
  • We are dependent on organisations for wages, other benefits, goods and services.
  • We are dependent on wider cosmological organisations for sunshine, nature, the air we breathe and the food and drink that sustains us.
  • We each imagine differently what our own soul is, and what soul means in these contexts.
  • And yet we are all connected, in ways that unify us and which are unique for each of us.

Traditional understanding of corporations

Traditionally organisations – according to conventional ‘modern’ thinking – are not considered to have a ‘soul’.

Traditionally the qualities of organisations are described in terms of:

  • ethos
  • values
  • philosophy
  • mission and aims, etc.

And yet, every organisation depends on people, for its design, innovation, staffing, audiences and customers, etc.

Families, large and small, have different relationships internally and externally compared with larger organisations, and yet operate with similar dynamics.

Each of us is an organisation of energies. Every family is an organisation of dynamics and relationships, as is every group of people regardless of its size and structure.

‘Soul’ is a way to characterise and re-imagine these dynamics, relationships and energies.

‘Soul’ is therefore a deeper way to understand the qualities of any organisation:

  • Meanings of ‘soul’ transcend conventional thinking, in business and management, and in any other discipline – because we lack the ability to prove what we might theorise about what a ‘soul’ is.
  • ‘Soul’ is an existential concept.
  • Existential refers to human life, death and existence, the universe(s) and everything.
  • ‘Soul’ refers to our sense of self that is beyond what we can imagine about being ‘alive’.

Other clues and questions

  • Cybernetics merging with love.
  • Everyone is different, which is lovely because everyone has someone to learn from and someone to teach.
  • We are one humanity.
  • We are one with nature and cosmos.
  • We cannot explain infinity with finite means.
  • Balance is a process not a state.
  • ‘Modern’ human constructs of time and space are not necessarily reliable.

Finite methods cannot explain infinite things

  • Science and language, and notions of time and space, are all finite human constructs that seek to explain the inexplicable.
  • The ways that humans use technical language (in maths, physics, other sciences, philosophy and theology etc) are finite.
  • We use the infinity symbol to represent infinity. Infinity is not a number. It’s an inexplicable concept that we must represent by a symbol, because we are unable to explain it in language and numbers, except to say things like, “keep increasing or decreasing something for ever,” in which case we are simply substituting the words ‘for ever’ for ‘infinity’, knowing that the words ‘for ever’, just like infinity, also defy explanation. ‘For ever’ equates to ‘infinity’ and ‘infinitely’. Substituting ‘for ever’ for ‘infinity’ does not explain what infinity is.
  • We do not know what happens to our consciousness and unconsciousness when we die. We do not know what happens to our ‘soul’ when we die. Nobody knows. Many people have a faith or a belief about what happens when we die, which is perfectly fine for them, but nobody can know for certain.
  • And so our ‘soul’ represents this inexplicable concept, rather like the infinity symbol represents notions of infinite quantities, of time or space and anything – large or small.
  • Our ‘soul’ represents our inability to explain the many dimensions of ‘reality’, and the many states of matter and energies, whether considered ‘real’, or proven or otherwise.
  • Our ‘soul’ is part of these vast unknowns.
  • Love is too. What is love, and our feelings of being in love?
  • Zeitgeist also is part of these vast unknowns.
  • So are our dreams. Waking and asleep.
  • So are many other inexplicable concepts and experiences that we all feel, fear, and love, to lesser or greater extents.
  • What are our connections with nature, and what are nature’s connections with everything else?
  • We cannot explain with certainty any of these things.

And so how do we begin to consider what ‘corporate soul’ could be, what it means, and its potential?

  • Might ‘corporate soul’ be a way to begin to consider inexplicable concepts in the context of how we organise ourselves, especially in work and business?
  • Might ‘corporate soul’ help us to help others, especially in and via organisations, to consider some of the big existential questions of life, and beyond life?
  • Who are we?
  • What is life?
  • What is my meaning?
  • How can an organisation help people to become more comfortable and peaceful in the uncertainty of an inexplicable existence?
  • Your new leaders perhaps need not explain anything.
  • They are the souls to help you find and grow your corporate soul 🙂
  • If you are interested to understand more then please contact me.
  • I do not know of anyone else doing this sort of work, and while everyone is able, few believe they can.
  • Anyone can be a soul coach, simply by being one 🙂

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorised

Primary Sidebar

© 2026 Alan Chapman